Fernald League Goes to the Supreme Court

 

The Fernald League has filed a petition to the US Supreme Court to restore Federal Judge Joseph Tauro's order of August 14, 2007, requiring Fernald placement as an option in the individual service plans of all Fernald residents. This order was overturned on jurisdictional grounds by the US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, last September.

The grounds for the action are that other circuits of the US Court of Appeals give more deference to the District Court judge who has overseen a consent decree, while the First Circuit, in this and other cases, treats the consent decree as a business contract, to be treated as if the District Court Judge had no special insight. If the Supreme court accepts the case, to determine how all circuits should view the role of the trial judge in consent decrees, Judge Tauro's order would probably go back into effect until the Supreme Court ruled.

If the Supreme Court were to reverse the Court of Appeals decision, then Judge Tauro's July, 2007 order would stand: that the Romney administration's announcement that it was closing Fernald was a violation of the civil rights of the residents to an individual service plan process free of coercion. This would not make it impossible to close the Fernald Center as part of Governor Patrick's plan to close four of the six developmental centers, but it would slow down the process considerably and probably force objective negotiations with families and guardians there and at other Developmental Centers.

Although the question of whether District Court judges are the best interpreters of consent decrees in their courts seems like a technicality, it really reaches to the heart of the 35-year-old case against the Commonwealth, Ricci v. Okin, in which Judge Tauro has been the only judge on the case. Judge Tauro guided the parties both to establish a community residential system for most of the residents of the state's large facilities for the treatment of mental retardation *and* guided the state to increase staff and treatment for those who chose to remain.

His 2007 order would be cited in other facility-closing cases around the country.

Click here for Blue Mass Group blog discussion of the Fernald League petition

Click here for .pdf text of the Fernald League petition (37 pages)

Click here for Waltham News-Tribune coverage of appeal

Click here for New England Cable News video (slow loading)

Click here to take action!

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

DMR, Governor' Cuts Target the Most Disabled

 This is the article from the December COFAR VOICE. For a discussion on the "Blue Mass Group" blog of DMR's tactics in dealing with the cuts, see (and add your own two cents):

 http://www.bluemassgroup.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=14087#163643 

 FY09 Budget, Governor’s Veto, Layoffs, and now… More Cuts for DMR!

Severe and Profoundly Retarded Hardest Hit

      Despite overall gains in the DMR FY09 budget now already in its fifth month, residential services for the most disabled people served by DMR took hard cuts in the FY09 budget. Then came mid-year cuts announced Oct. 15, which again axed facility funding.

     The six developmental centers and the approximately 100 state-operated group homes were funded below DMR’s request throughout the state budget process, then forced to absorb 2008 fuel bills, slammed by Governor Patrick’s veto of $750,000 from facilities, and ended up about $5 million short, more if the price of oil and gasoline stay high.

     As a result, up to 200 layoffs at five of the six developmental centers began in September, with voluntary retirement incentives. Facility directors were given a number, and were able to refuse resignations in vital areas, but inevitably program will suffer.

     Then came the worse news: Another $3 million slashed out of the facilities line Oct. 15 as declining state revenues forced another round of cutbacks. As this issue goes to press, DMR has not described how it can  accomplish another cut to the facilities line without falling below Medicaid staffing mandates, endangering the residents and risking a new round of scandals in the much-improved former “state schools.”

     Although a federal appeals panel Oct. 1 reversed Judge Tauro’s 2007 order and appeared to clear the way for closing the Fernald Center (see “Tauro Reversed,” page 4), state officials had emphasized an orderly and legal process, which would have little impact in FY09. The governor's note on the October 15 9C cut mentioned savings to be realized by closing a facility, but as COFAR has repeatedly demonstrated, there are not savings to be realized by a unilateral closing at Fernald.

     “In any case,” said COFAR Executive Director Colleen Lutkevich, “Other state cutbacks will make it very hard to move anyone in the DMR system. State-operated group homes have less money than last year, and the community residential budget is also slightly reduced. With the logjam in residential services, we felt we had to recommend deferring the governor’s ‘Community First Initiative’ – to get elderly and disabled people out of nursing homes and back home or into active treatment, even though we generally support that goal. And the Governor agreed, but that dries up another funding source to make a few more DMR residential beds.

     “Meanwhile, there is another $7 million in new cuts across the DMR system, so it’s harder for people in all settings, harder to get help from DMR administrators to navigate the minefield, and we are even losing Medicaid matching funds in the Autism waiver.”

     The forum at www.cofar.org is a good place to post observations on where the DMR cutbacks are most obvious to you.

     The other large cuts made by the Governor are to DMR administration, where they may send the caseloads of service coordinators toward an impossible 60 people each; to the Autism department, which was increasing the number of families receiving early intervention; and to DOE-DMR, a joint program which attempts to coordinate community based services for young people with special needs and DMR eligibility to keep them at home and avoid expensive residential school placements. It can be argued that all of these cuts target the minority of the most disabled people served by DMR, but the flat-funded or slightly cut contracted community-residential system is also under great demographic pressure, and thus more people with mild and moderate MR/DD are waiting around longer without any or adaquate services, although provider capacity is at least being maintained.

--end--, but comments are enabled!

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

US Court of Appeals reverses Judge Tauro's ruling on Fernald

COFAR released this initial response this evening: 

 Dear COFAR Members,We received news of the ruling by the US Appeals Court which is not the news we wanted.  The court overturned Judge Tauro’s ruling, stating that he did not have the right to reopen the Ricci case as there had been no findings of systemic violations.While this is disappointing news, please keep in mind that both Judge Tauro’s ruling as well as the ruling of the Appeals Court are very narrow.  Nothing in this ruling denies the Fernald residents or any other Ricci class members their rights to “equal or better” services; and DMR can and must be held to that standard, both in Judge Tauro’s court and in State court.  Furthermore, all DMR clients, whether or not they are class members, have many rights under both DMR regulations and Massachusetts state law.  We fully expect that DMR will uphold these laws and regulations, and we urge guardians to be aware of their rights, and to use the appeals system if they feel it is necessary to maintain the rights of their wards. This ruling is neither a mandate nor a green light for DMR to close all facilities in Massachusetts. We look forward to working cooperatively with both DMR and the courts in seeking the services that our relatives are entitled to. 

-- Colleen Lutkevich

Executive Director, COFAR

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5